Routes, loads, and rosters — sampled from a distribution that prefers good answers.

Vehicle routing under capacity. Knapsack loading. Shift rostering with fairness rules. Each is a combinatorial cliff where one more constraint doubles the pain. We formulate them as energy landscapes and let a quantum sampler roll downhill — measurably better than chance.

Every container is a variable; every constraint is a wall.
Every container is a variable; every constraint is a wall.
The problem, in your words

What actually hurts.

Routing under capacity

The moment trucks have limits and depots have windows, routing leaves easy territory. Our QAOA demonstration finds the true optimum with 32.5% of samples — random guessing manages 3.1%.

Loading is a knapsack

Weight, volume, priority, incompatibility — loading is the oldest NP-hard problem wearing a safety vest. As a QUBO it runs today at demonstration scale.

Rosters people accept

A schedule is only optimal if the crew shows up. Fairness constraints fold into the same energy landscape, so the sampler prefers rosters people can live with.

How an engagement runs

Three steps. One written verdict.

01

Formulate

We take one lane, one depot, one roster — your data, anonymised — and write the QUBO: variables, penalties, and what a violation actually costs you.

02

Run and measure

Training runs where every objective evaluation is a real circuit execution. You watch the sample distribution shift toward feasible optima, quantified against guessing.

03

Verdict in writing

Where your instance sizes sit against today's hardware, when the crossover could arrive, and what your OR team should do meanwhile — pursue, park, or drop.

Proof, not projection

What we've already measured.

These programs are published in our algorithm library. The numbers below come from recorded executions we can reproduce on demand.

vehicle-routing-qaoa

Capacity-constrained routing trained with QAOA.

Measured: True optimum captured 32.5% of shots vs 3.1% guessing — a 10.4× concentration.

knapsack-qaoa

Constrained loading as a QUBO with slack variables.

Measured: Feasible optimum dominates the sample distribution after training.

shift-scheduling

Workforce rostering with coverage and fairness penalties.

Measured: Best sampled roster satisfied every hard constraint.

Results are from the library items' own recorded runs on our simulator — the same one your browser uses.

Where we draw the line

What we will not claim.

At real fleet scale, mature OR solvers — CPLEX, OR-Tools, your dispatcher's intuition — still win. Our routing program's own output says exactly that. What you buy today is formulation capital.

  • No claimed advantage on production fleets — the crossover has not happened.
  • The QUBO formulations you build now port unchanged to better hardware later.
Talk to us

Bring us one route that hurts.

A lane, a load plan, a roster — describe the constraint that bites and an engineer replies.

typically replies within a day — an engineer, not a script
Chemistry & Pharma All solutions Manufacturing